The Economy of Access

Philip K. Dick wrote about a door demanding payment in 1969 in his novel Ubik.

T. Candice Smith's steering wheel locked up on Interstate 15 in Nevada back in 2013.

Santoshi Kumari starved to death asking for rice in 2017.

For 116 years - from E.M. Forster's "The Machine Stops" to Neil Postman's "Technopoly" - writers warned that our machines would stop serving us and start controlling us.

We called it science fiction right up until the bodies started piling up.

Now Wall Street is building the final piece: a $30 billion tokenization machine that transforms every asset you touch into programmable property, every payment into a permission request, and every door into a negotiation you're guaranteed to lose.

Nick Szabo wrote the manual in 1997, BlackRock scaled it to billions through their BUIDL fund, and from Washington to Brussels to Beijing, governments are mandating the infrastructure to make it universal.

When your car won't start and your bank account won't unlock, will there be a human left to call?

Three mechanisms. One cage. Separately, they look like progress.

Together, they're the architecture of a new kind of prison - one where the bars are biometric scanners, the guards are algorithms, and the warden is a smart contract with no phone number.

T. Candice Smith was doing 70 mph on Interstate 15 in 2013 when her car's kill switch activated. "All of a sudden the steering wheel locked up and the car shut off," she testified to Nevada's legislature. "I was barely able to make it to the left shoulder."

Her crime? A late payment on her subprime auto loan.

PassTime, a Colorado manufacturer, calls these devices helpful tools that "buy time to negotiate a payment plan."

Sophia Romero, staff attorney in the Consumer Rights Project at the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, reported clients whose "cars were off most of the time" - payment schedules mismatched with payday cycles, leaving borrowers trapped in a loop where the disabled car prevents them from reaching work, which prevents them from earning money, which prevents them from making the payment that would unlock the car.

Vicious by design.

It took four years of industry opposition, but Nevada finally acted. Senate Bill 350, signed in June 2017, now requires lenders to wait at least 30 days past due before activation, provide written disclosure, give 48-hour notice, and offer two 24-hour emergency overrides per payment cycle.

Translation: The system worked exactly as designed until enough bodies piled up to force regulation.

Now here's the connection to tokenization.

What happens when the same logic scales to tokenized assets where no legislature can vote on the smart contract terms?

Nick Szabo foreshadowed this in 1997: "Smart contracts can embed contracts in all sorts of property that is valuable and controlled by digital means. If the owner fails to make payments, the smart contract invokes the lien protocol, which returns control of the car keys to the bank."

Twenty-eight years later, the smart locks exist. They don't negotiate. They don't care if you're on a highway or in a parking lot. They just execute the contract and let physics handle the rest.

Physical control handles the assets you can touch - your car, your home, the door that won't open.

But what happens when the system controlling access doesn't recognize you exist?

Authentication Failure

Santoshi Kumari was 11 years old when she spent eight days starving to death in Karimati village, Jharkhand.

Her family's ration card had been canceled for failing to link it to India's Aadhaar biometric ID system.

On her final night, she asked her mother for rice as consciousness slipped away. Only tea and salt remained in the house.

Government officials claimed malaria. Her mother said starvation.

She wasn't alone. The Right to Food Campaign documented 57 starvation deaths between 2015 and 2018.

At least 19 traced directly to Aadhaar authentication failures.

The system voided 43.9 million ration cards over four years - not because people weren't hungry, but because the cards failed biometric authentication.

UIDAI CEO Ajay Bhushan Pandey submitted documents to India's Supreme Court showing his own biometrics failed in 5 of 26 authentication attempts during a 4.5-month period - a 19.2% failure rate.

The single time he attempted biometric authentication, it failed with error code 330: "Biometrics locked by Aadhaar holder." He'd locked his own biometric data to prevent it from being used.

The government admits a 12% failure rate for Aadhaar-based biometric authentication across government services.

Manual laborers with worn fingerprints. Elderly citizens with changed iris patterns.

India's Comptroller and Auditor General documented that UIDAI made over 30 million biometric updates in a single year, with 73% categorized as "voluntary" updates - which included those necessitated by repeated authentication failures and poor-quality initial biometric capture.

People's bodies aged out of the algorithm's parameters, and they were charged 100 rupees ($1.11) each time to update their own biometrics.

E.M. Forster wrote in 1909: "The Machine is much, but it is not everything. I see something like you in this plate, but I do not see you."

Santoshi Kumari's mother saw her daughter die while the Machine saw insufficient authentication credentials.

These aren't just cautionary tales - they're proof that systems can punish and starve without malice, setting the stage for a world where the machines decide, and no human can intervene.

Why do these older stories matter to our current and future situation?

Physical locks stop your car. Biometric gates block your food. But neither requires human cruelty - just automated indifference.

What happens when you add a third layer that removes humans from the decision entirely?

The Convergence

This is no longer a fringe experiment. As of late 2025, institutions have already moved tens of billions through on‑chain funds - and tokenized U.S. Treasury shares from BlackRock are accepted as collateral on major exchanges. The infrastructure is live.

The GENIUS Act, signed July 2025, requires every stablecoin issuer to maintain "technological capability to freeze and seize" on command.

Smart contracts don't sleep. Don't negotiate. Don't make exceptions for highway speeds or starving children.

George Orwell wrote in 1984: "You had to live in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and every movement scrutinized."

Now add one more layer: every transaction must be approved, every access must be authenticated, and every failure is final.

Physical locks controlled by code. Financial access gated by biometrics. Enforcement automated beyond human override.

Separately, each layer looks like progress - better security, fraud prevention, operational efficiency.

Together, they create something Philip K. Dick's door would recognize: a system where property doesn't belong to you anymore, where ownership becomes conditional access, and where one missed payment or one failed fingerprint scan transforms you from owner to beggar.

Forster's characters forgot humans built the Machine. Huxley's citizens learned to love their servitude. Orwell's subjects accepted surveillance as safety.

We're doing all three simultaneously while calling it innovation.

Three layers operational, proven at scale, bodies already counted.

So what happens when this stops being an experiment and becomes global infrastructure?

The Expanding Cage

Wall Street didn't wait for permission. They built the infrastructure, ran the pilots, and scaled to billions before anyone bothered asking questions.

Three years - That's how long it took to grow tokenized real-world assets from $5 billion to $24 billion - a 380% explosion.

BlackRock's Larry Fink calls progress: "Tokenization can greatly expand the world of investable assets beyond the listed stocks and bonds that dominate markets today."

Private credit leads at 61% of the market. Institutional funds at 2% - but Wall Street isn't building for today's numbers. They're positioning for the $30 trillion market projected by 2034.

Turkey shows where this leads. Auto loan borrowers pay 5% monthly - over 100% annually, 70 percentage points above inflation.

Blockworks asked the obvious question: "If those loans were tokenized and governed by a smart contract that automatically disables a car when a borrower defaults, wouldn't that attract investors from everywhere?"

Investors certainly noticed the potential for automated enforcement baked into the contracts.

RealT brought tokenization to Detroit - 1,500+ housing units sliced into blockchain fragments and sold to investors in 150 countries for as little as $50.

Except the properties are crumbling. Hundreds behind on taxes, thousands of blight violations, tenants like Shirquera Ayers living with black mold and broken showers while filing work orders that nobody answers.

When ownership gets fractured across thousands of anonymous wallet addresses scattered across 150 countries, who exactly do you call when the ceiling collapses?

Ray Bradbury predicted mechanical hounds that could "remember and identify 10,000 odor indexes on 10,000 men without resetting."

RealT built something simpler: a system where responsibility dissolves into ten thousand pieces too small to sue.

Wall Street proved the model works domestically - tokenize, fragment, extract.

But the real prize requires going global.

When did governments worldwide decide to mandate the exact infrastructure needed to make this system universal?

Mandate Season

September 2025 brought the mandates.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced digital ID would become mandatory for employment by 2029.

Nearly 3 million people signed a petition against it - one of the largest in British history. All major opposition parties stated their opposition.

The petition didn’t stop the bill - despite widespread opposition, the UK government continues to advance its digital ID scheme. MPs are scheduled to debate the petition on December 8.

Big Brother Watch calls the digital ID scheme "sleepwalking into a dystopian nightmare."

Across the Channel, Europe moves faster.

EU member states have until September 2026 to provide Digital Identity Wallets to all citizens - civil status, diplomas, bank accounts, medical records all consolidated under unified standards.

September 2025 saw the first wallet certified at the EU's highest level of assurance: Identyum's ID Wallet, featuring face biometrics, liveness detection, and document scanning - all the infrastructure needed to gate access permanently.

Vietnam went further. September 2025: 86 million bank accounts frozen for lacking biometric verification. That's 43% of all accounts in the country.

Population 101 million, previously had ~200 million accounts. Now 113 million remain active.

No Nepal-style uprising - no streets filled with students like the ones who set their Prime Minister's residence on fire in September after a social media ban, forcing the government to back down in five days. No burning government buildings. No 19 dead from police fire.

No remote solutions. No video verification. Your funds remain inaccessible until you stand in front of the machine and let it read your face.

Just silent coercion as expatriates discovered they'd need to fly back to Vietnam in person for biometric scanning.

Your money exists. You earned it. But you can't access it unless you physically present your face to a machine. Call it authentication. Call it security. Call it whatever helps you sleep. The funds stay frozen until you comply.

China may have shown everyone the blueprint for the endpoint.

Digital yuan has processed $7.3 trillion yuan in transactions as of mid-2024.

The currency is programmable - expiration dates tested in pilot programs forcing recipients to spend within set timeframes.

Journalist Liu Hu was blacklisted in 2016 after a defamation case. When he tried to book a flight, the system rejected him as "not qualified". He can't buy plane tickets, use high-speed trains, purchase property, or take out a loan.

"There was no file, no police warrant, no official advance notification. They just cut me off from the things I was once entitled to," he said.

World Economic Forum praised it in October 2024 as a "model CBDC" that "democratizes access to banking services" - no mention of the surveillance architecture, the social credit system, or Liu Hu's locked existence.

Neil Postman wrote in 1993: "Technology is a state of culture. It is also a state of mind. It consists in the deification of technology, which means that the culture seeks its authorization in technology, finds its satisfactions in technology, and takes its orders from technology."

China deified the algorithm. Britain photographs every face. Europe mandates the wallet. Vietnam freezes the accounts. Wall Street tokenizes the assets.

When programmable money meets mandatory biometric gates across every major economy simultaneously, are we watching convergence or coordination?

The Chinese Finger Trap

Wall Street promised democratization. Fractional ownership for the masses. 24/7 global markets. Financial inclusion - or so the brochure promised.

By August 2025 the academics finally said the quiet part out loud: "While technical progress has been rapid, with over $25 billion in tokenized RWAs brought on-chain as of 2025, liquidity remains a critical bottleneck" - dead order books, long bag-holding, and participation charts that look like heart monitors flatlining.

Translation: You can buy in, but you can't cash out.

Trading gets "restricted to accredited or whitelisted investors" - the same gatekeepers tokenization supposedly eliminated.

Platforms operate as "technological islands" where assets get "blocked" because systems don't talk to each other.

You might hold a tokenized sliver of Detroit, but selling it means hopping between walled-garden exchanges, clearing KYC checkpoints, and praying someone out there actually wants your fraction of a boarded-up duplex.

The IMF published five warnings in January 2025. They weren't subtle. They even made a video in November that highlights these risks as well.

Flash crashes amplified: "Automated, instant-execution trades can trigger sharp declines." No circuit breakers. No trading halts. Just algorithms executing 24/7 until everything collapses.

Extreme volatility: "24/7 trading may speed up a run on investment funds." Markets never sleep means panic never stops.

Lack of interoperability: Platforms are "technological islands," assets are "blocked." Fragmentation by design.

Network concentration risk: "Single point of failure to cyberattacks." Everyone uses the same infrastructure. One breach threatens everyone.

Smart contract cascade failures: "Complex, interlinked systems could behave like a domino chain under stress." One failure triggers the next triggers the next until the system collapses entirely.

Bottom line: "Tokenization may amplify shocks if it induces institutions to become more interconnected and hold lower liquidity buffers or higher leverage, potentially jeopardizing financial stability."

They're building systemic risk at scale while marketing it as safety.

But retail doesn't need to worry about systemic vulnerabilities or improper liquidity management, right?

October 2025 showed what happens when leverage hides behind smoke.

Stream Finance and Elixir Network allegedly spun $1.9M into $14.5M by looping the same USDC through deUSD → xUSD → back again - a recursive rinse-and-repeat that printed tokens out of thin air.

Hyperithm, managing $160 million across these interconnected positions, stress-tested the collapse scenarios and removed ALL exposure before quietly exiting with $10 million.

Retail depositors stayed put, three degrees of separation from collapse, unaware the institutional money had already left.

Retail essentially got rugged and was the last to know.

The difference between innovation and fraud isn't in the code - it's in what you choose to disclose and when you choose to exit.

Liquidity that doesn't exist. Biometric data that can't be reset. Systemic risks the IMF explicitly warned about. Infrastructure breaches selling records for pocket change. Recursive loops marketed as yield farming.

So who's left holding the bag when the prophets' warnings finally materialize?

Loving the Cage

Aldous Huxley called it in 1962: "The nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: we are developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy to get people to love their servitude."

Wall Street didn't force this system on anyone. They marketed it.

Democratized ownership. Financial inclusion. Fractional access to institutional-grade assets. Twenty-four hour global markets. Transparency through blockchain.

Except the access gates lock permanently when authentication fails. The property can't be sold even when tokenized. The landlord is scattered across 150 countries and never answers.

The money knows who's spending it and can refuse to be spent. You're renting your existence by the month from a cage built with your own biometric data.

E.M. Forster saw this in 1909. In "The Machine Stops," Vashti's son Kuno begs her to visit. The air-ship takes only two days. She can't imagine why meeting matters when they can video chat.

When the Machine finally stops, Vashti dies still believing it will save her. She forgot humans built it. She forgot humans could fix it. By then, nobody remembered how.

Neil Postman warned us in 1992 about the real danger: "We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves.

But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision in 1984, there was another - Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one."

Orwell's boot stamping on a human face forever gets headlines. Huxley's willing surrender to comfortable numbness gets embedded in user agreements nobody reads.

The breakthrough wasn't the technology. Smart contracts existed. Biometric systems worked. Tokenization scaled.

The breakthrough was convincing people that conditional access equals ownership. That renting your existence is liberation. That the cage is actually a luxury suite - and look how seamlessly the bars fit your wrists.

Two countries showed us the choice we're facing.

Nepal banned social media in September 2025. Five days later, Gen Z burned the Prime

Minister's residence to the ground. Nineteen dead from police fire. The ban lifted. The government resigned.

Vietnam froze 86 million bank accounts around the same time. No riots. No fires. Just silent compliance.

Nepal chose fire. Vietnam chose silence.

The technocracy rolls forward anyway - a steamroller flattening everything in its path without once asking the people if they want this.

The question isn't which response wins. It's whether either response matters when the infrastructure is already deployed, the contracts are already executing, and Wall Street has already moved hundreds of billions through systems that don't require permission or consensus.

Forster's characters forgot humans built the Machine. Huxley's citizens learned to love their servitude. Orwell's subjects accepted surveillance as safety.

Postman watched us surrender culture to technology. Bradbury predicted mechanical hounds tracking citizens. Dick imagined doors demanding payment.

We're doing all of it simultaneously while buying tokens that represent fractional ownership of the bars of our own cage.

The prophets spent 116 years warning us. We spent 116 years calling it fiction.

When does the story stop being about what's coming and start being about what we already handed them?

Philip K. Dick wrote about a door demanding payment.

The door doesn't negotiate anymore - it just executes the smart contract.

Wall Street scaled the infrastructure, governments mandated the biometric gates, and the GENIUS Act legalized the freeze-and-seize capability.

From Forster's Machine to Postman's Technopoly, every warning converged into a single operational system with a documented body count.

We're not reading science fiction anymore - we're living in the footnotes of prophecies we dismissed as paranoid fantasy right up until the authentication failures became fatal.

Philip K. Dick's door demanded five cents. T. Candice Smith's car demanded perfect payment timing. Santoshi Kumari's ration system demanded functioning fingerprints.

The system demands everything now, and negotiation ended the moment we signed the user agreement.

When the door finally locks and there's no human on the other side to hear you knocking, will you remember who sold you the keys?

REKT, anonim yazarlar için halka açık bir platform olarak hizmet eder, REKT'te bulunan görüşler veya içerik için hiçbir sorumluluk kabul etmiyoruz.

bağış yap (ETH / ERC20): 0x3C5c2F4bCeC51a36494682f91Dbc6cA7c63B514C

sorumluluk reddi:

REKT, Web Sitemizde veya hizmetlerimizle bağlantılı olarak web sitemizin ANON yazarı veya REKT tarafından gönderilen, yayınlanan veya neden olunan hiçbir içerikten hiçbir şekilde sorumlu veya yükümlü değildir. Anon yazarın davranışları ve gönderileri için kurallar sağlamamıza rağmen, onun web sitemizde veya hizmetlerimizde yayınladığı, ilettiği veya paylaştığı şeylerden sorumlu değiliz veya web sitemizde ve hizmetlerimizde karşılaşabileceğiniz herhangi bir saldırgan, uygunsuz, müstehcen, yasa dışı veya başka şekilde sakıncalı olan içerikten sorumlu değiliz. REKT, Web Sitemizin veya Hizmetlerimizin herhangi bir kullanıcısının çevrimiçi veya çevrimdışı davranışlarından sorumlu değildir.