GENIUS or Gimmick?

Trump signed the GENIUS Act on July 18, 2025.

Wall Street suits celebrated with champagne. DeFi developers opened compliance manuals they'd never wanted to read.

Congress delivered what the industry celebrated as crypto's biggest legislative win - the House voting 308-122 and the Senate 68-30 to create the first comprehensive federal framework for stablecoin regulation.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's projections paint a $2 trillion stablecoin market under federal control.

Yet as Circle shares rocketed 33% and Coinbase touched all-time highs at $444.64, something felt off.

Behind the celebration, a darker truth emerged: this wasn't crypto winning against the system - this was the system getting a victory against the crypto industry.

The GENIUS Act creates federal licensing for stablecoin issuers, requires 1:1 reserves in cash or Treasuries, bans yield for holders, mandates freeze/seizure capabilities, and excludes algorithmic/decentralized protocols.

DeFi protocols scrambled to understand how decentralized systems could comply with regulations designed for banks.

The stablecoin "solution" everyone's been waiting for... or the final nail in decentralization's coffin?

Behind the regulatory theater lies a different story.

Not crypto's triumph over government hostility, but Wall Street's final victory in a war most didn't realize was being fought.

Growing and Enhancing New Innovation in U.S. Stablecoins - the GENIUS Act's full name reads like legislative parody. Progress through restriction.

Enhancement through elimination. New solutions that look suspiciously like old banking with blockchain sprinkles.

Banks and regulated financial institutions can issue stablecoins under the new framework.

Decentralized protocols operating without corporate structures cannot qualify as "permitted payment stablecoin issuers."

Algorithmic stablecoins like DAI face compliance challenges due to their backing mechanisms and governance structures.

Stablecoin issuers are prohibited from paying interest or yield directly to token holders.

Reserve requirements mandate 1:1 backing with highly liquid assets including cash and U.S. Treasuries.

Issuers must comply with KYC/AML regulations.

The legislation requires technological capabilities to freeze accounts and seize funds when legally compelled to do so.

Deutsche Bank data shows $28 trillion in stablecoin transactions during 2024 - exceeding Mastercard and Visa combined.

Compliance-ready companies now control the pathway to that massive market expansion.

But who decided that regulatory clarity was worth killing the protocols that built the stablecoin market in the first place?

The $100 Million Influence Campaign

Crypto conquered Washington the old-fashioned way - by buying it.

Over $100 million flowed into Congressional campaigns and lobbying efforts throughout 2024-2025.

Technical innovation? Grassroots support? Not how things work in Trump's pay-to-play DC.

Traditional Wall Street lobbyists watched crypto money make their efforts look like pocket change.

Senator Bill Hagerty from Tennessee carried water as primary sponsor, somehow convincing 18 Democrats to join the party by the final Senate vote.

Tim Scott's Banking Committee shuffled through nearly 40 amendments.

Final vote: 18-6 approval.

Senator Jeff Merkley called it: "rubberstamping Trump's crypto corruption."

Hard to argue when Trump made over $57 million from World Liberty Financial token sales in 2024, then signed the exact legislation that pumps his bags.

Trump's conflict through World Liberty Financial token holdings creates direct financial benefit from signing this legislation - similar to how defense contractors benefit from military spending bills they lobby for.

Merkley’s concerns about conflicts of interest fell on deaf ears.

Trump signed legislation that directly benefits his crypto holdings while the industry celebrated its "watershed moment."

Lobbying group, the Blockchain Association praised the victory, but consumer advocacy groups like Americans for Financial Reform warned of risks to small investors.

When $100 million can rewrite financial law, what does that say about whose interests really matter?

The Victory Lap

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire couldn't contain his excitement.

"The GENIUS Act really enshrines into law Circle's way of doing business," he said in a White House interview as shares rocketed 33% after Senate passage.

Circle had been preparing for this exact moment.

They built their entire compliance infrastructure around becoming the regulated stablecoin winner.

USDC was already playing by the new rules - 100% backed by cash and Treasuries, ready to scale.

Even Tether's Paolo Ardoino jumped on the bandwagon, announcing plans for moving some of his global business into the U.S.

Bold move for a $160+ billion stablecoin that's been playing offshore dodgeball with regulators.

While Tether has yet to complete a full audit, Ardoino said "We have three years to make sure this process can go through properly" under the new regulatory framework.

Coinbase shares surged following the GENIUS Act's Senate passage. Brian Armstrong called the legislation a "big milestone" while pushing for more market structure reforms.

Wall Street banks circled like sharks.

JPMorgan dropped JPMD deposit tokens on Base. Bank of America's CEO started talking about stablecoin plans.

PNC Financial Services announced a strategic Coinbase partnership.

Even Amazon and Walmart started exploring stablecoin-style payment offerings.

The corporate adoption train was leaving the station, and every major institution wanted a seat.

We're officially in the absorption phase.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then they try to conquer you by absorbing you... then you win?

We did win, right?

The Compliance Squeeze

MakerDAO (now known as Sky) helped build the decentralized stablecoin dream.

DAI was everything crypto promised - decentralized collateralization, no central authority, tech advancement beating regulation.

Now it faces regulatory uncertainty. Depending on how they play their cards.

The GENIUS Act wants corporate entities running stablecoins.

DAI doesn't have a CEO. No headquarters. No compliance team. Just smart contracts and token holders voting on proposals.

That was the entire point - removing humans from money creation.

DAI's backing creates regulatory complications. ETH collateral? Not allowed under GENIUS Act requirements. WBTC deposits? Nope.

But with DAI depending on centralized stablecoins like USDC for over 50% of its backing, the compliance picture gets complex.

But Sky(formerly MakerDAO) hedged its bets.

Here's where Sky got clever.

In 2024, they launched USDS - technically identical to DAI but with proxy upgradeable contracts that could add freeze functionality through governance votes.

The upgrade mechanism works through a simple governance proposal that can activate compliance features with a token holder vote - no hard fork required.

The freeze function isn't implemented yet, but the capability exists. A regulatory insurance policy disguised as technical architecture.

The protocol that invented decentralized lending now faces a choice: maintain DAI's purity and risk U.S. exclusion, or activate USDS's compliance capabilities and join the regulated club.

This isn't death - it's forced evolution. And maybe that's not entirely bad.

The existential threat isn't technical - it's regulatory.

Core contracts getting blacklisted.

Could DAI be forced into controlled demolition while USDS gets the regulatory blessing?

Immutable smart contracts become a problem when authorities want freeze buttons that don't exist.

Liquity’s LUSD stablecoin runs on immutable contracts with ETH and LSTs for collateral.

The protocol maintains minimal governance solely for directing front-end incentives, while its core smart contracts are immutable and non-upgradeable - making regulatory compliance modifications impossible.

That purity now looks like a liability.

Under GENIUS, stablecoins need freeze functions. Liquity can’t provide them.

Even if the team wanted to cooperate, they literally can’t modify the system.

In a post-GENIUS world, Liquity stands outside the law - maybe defiantly, maybe fatally.

Or maybe that becomes its selling point to those who still remember what decentralization means.

But some are being proactive.

Frax isn’t sweating the GENIUS Act. In fact, they’re celebrating it.

Founder Sam Kazemian called it a “historic win” and claimed Frax was built with GENIUS compliance in mind - part of a long game to become the U.S.-favored digital dollar.

Their original fractional-algorithmic model? More like a testnet.

The real product is a fully collateralized, fully compliant stablecoin that wears its patriotism like armor.

Call it pragmatic. Call it prophetic. Or call it what it is: a calculated surrender to regulation in exchange for empire-scale legitimacy.

Meanwhile, PayPal’s PYUSD didn’t need to adapt - it launched with compliance baked in from day one, built by Paxos under the watchful eye of U.S. regulators.

The law entrenches players like Circle and PayPal, while sidelining crypto-native protocols. Even Tether’s pivot and Frax’s cooperation are grudging adaptations, not triumphs.

For decentralized stablecoins like DAI, the path forward is uncertain - and likely dysfunctional in the U.S.

But let's be real about what survives.

Protocols like Aave and Curve aren't going anywhere - they're about to feast.

Regulated stablecoins need somewhere to generate yield.

DeFi protocols provide that infrastructure.

More compliant stablecoins flowing through their systems means more fees, more TVL, more revenue.

The rails stay. The fuel changes.

Other protocols scramble between hybrid approaches, offshore migration, or simply giving up on U.S. markets.

But this is crypto's awkward puberty, not its funeral.

The first regulatory framework is never the final one.

With proper lobbying and strategic pressure, future iterations could preserve more decentralized ideals while meeting regulatory requirements.

This is round one, not the final boss fight.

Will we master the game before they change the rules again?

The Ticking Time Bomb

But in trying to build a safe, controlled system, lawmakers may have engineered something far more dangerous.

The GENIUS Act creates a systemic risk that makes 2008 look quaint.

By forcing stablecoin reserves into U.S. Treasuries, Congress just built the world's most explosive financial weapon.

Bessent's $2 trillion projection means massive Treasury purchases.

Estimates show stablecoins already hold around $200 billion in U.S. Treasuries.

Tether alone was the seventh-largest buyer of U.S. Treasuries in 2024 - surpassing entire countries in demand for government debt.

Now imagine quadrupling that exposure.

What happens when stablecoin users panic?

When confidence cracks and everyone rushes for redemptions simultaneously?

Issuers dump Treasuries to cover redemptions. Treasury prices crash.

The "risk-free" assets propping up the entire system turn toxic.

Money market funds holding the same paper get wrecked. Banks with Treasury exposure bleed losses.

The Fed faces an ugly choice - watch Treasury markets implode or bail out crypto instruments they don't even understand.

Bank runs used to take days.

Stablecoin runs happen in minutes, sometimes even blocks.

The efficiency crypto promised becomes the weapon that destroys everything.

Months of financial crisis compressed into one hellish trading session.

When the selling starts, there's nothing to catch the falling knife.

The GENIUS Act's own structure amplifies these risks.

While claiming to create "clarity," the legislation fragments oversight between federal and state regulators, creating coordination gaps during crisis moments.

When milliseconds matter in digital markets, bureaucratic confusion could turn manageable stress into systemic collapse.

When your "solution" to financial instability could be a bigger bomb, who's really getting protected?

The Great Migration

Innovation doesn't die - it emigrates.

America builds walls, other countries build bridges.

While the U.S. tightens its grip, a three-way digital currency war is reshaping global finance.

China's digital yuan ambitions represent more than technological advancement - they're direct competition with dollar-backed stablecoins.

Beijing's National Finance and Development Laboratory openly calls for yuan-backed stablecoins to counter U.S. dominance.

With $7 trillion in digital yuan transactions already processed and 180 million digital wallets opened, China isn't playing catch-up - it's building parallel infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Europe sits caught between superpowers. ECB President Lagarde warns about dollar stablecoins undermining EU financial independence, but Brussels hasn't figured out how to regulate DeFi without killing it.

The EU's MiCA regulation creates frameworks while leaving innovation gaps - sometimes the best regulation is the absence of bad regulation.

Stablecoin policy has become a national competitiveness strategy.

The country that gets digital currency right doesn't just win crypto - they potentially reshape global monetary flows for decades.

As the U.S. restricts development, Hong Kong may attract displaced projects, while Singapore tightens its grip and steps back from the race.

America spent decades spreading financial innovation worldwide.

Now that innovation comes home through crypto, and Congress wants to stuff it back into banking boxes.

The irony would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

Legal challenges are coming.

Consumer advocates argue the GENIUS Act fails to provide the safeguards that consumers reasonably expect - such as enforceable redemption rights, third‑party auditing, or federal insurance protection.

Separately, Congressional drafters anticipated constitutional challenges - so the final GENIUS text explicitly exempts activities like publishing code or running validator nodes from registration, as long as there's no custody involved.

But legal clarity and political intent don’t always travel together.

The 18-month implementation timeline creates regulatory purgatory while agencies write the actual rules.

Hopefully the window gives smart protocols time to build escape routes before the regulatory cage locks shut.

Marc Zeller from Aave put it comically: "In three years when Genius Act thingy goes live it's game over for Maker And Aave."

Meanwhile, maybe the smartest developers are quietly updating their GitHub repositories. Because the smart ones figure out how to pivot.

Domicile changes. New legal structures. Fresh marketing materials highlighting "regulatory-friendly jurisdictions."

Brain drain accelerating toward countries that understand the difference between innovation and speculation.

When America chooses regulatory capture over technological leadership, who wins the future?

Are we witnessing an Act of progress - or just another Act of control?

We built something beautiful - programmable money, algorithmic stability, financial freedom from middlemen.

The GENIUS Act doesn't regulate crypto - it picks winners and calls it consumer protection.

Decentralization gets side tracked. Compliance or death.

DeFi's revolution drowns in forms and filing deadlines.

Kristi Noem runs Homeland Security now, with broad discretion over REAL ID implementation.

The framework remains open-ended - she could potentially link your stablecoin transactions to biometric data if circumstances demanded it.

This surveillance potential echoes the Patriot Act's expansion of government monitoring powers post-9/11 and FinCEN's travel rule requirements that already track crypto transactions above $3,000.

The surveillance infrastructure sits there waiting, needing only the right crisis to justify activation.

It would be a shame if this beautiful system we built just gets rolled into the broken, corrupt machinery it was meant to replace.

But revolutions don't die - they adapt, evolve, and find new frontiers.

Maybe the real innovation happens in jurisdictions that still remember what financial freedom means.

Maybe the protocols smart enough to escape this regulatory cage will build the future while America argues about compliance forms.

But after all the lobbying money and regulatory capture, we're left with a choice.

The revolution isn't over - it's just learning to speak a new language.

Who will be the ones writing the code?

REKT sert de plateforme publique pour des auteurs anonymes, nous déclinons toute responsabilité quant aux opinions ou contenus hébergés sur REKT.

faites un don (ETH / ERC20): 0x3C5c2F4bCeC51a36494682f91Dbc6cA7c63B514C

avertissement:

REKT n'est responsable en aucune manière du contenu publié sur notre site Web ou en lien avec nos Services, qu'il soit publié ou occasionné par l'Auteur Anon de notre site Web, ou par REKT. Bien que nous fournissions des règles pour la conduite et les publications de l'Auteur Anon, nous ne contrôlons pas et ne sommes pas responsables de ce que l'Auteur Anon publie, transmet ou partage sur notre site Web ou nos Services, et ne sommes pas responsables de tout contenu offensant, inapproprié, obscène, illégal ou autrement répréhensible que vous pourriez rencontrer sur notre site Web ou nos Services. REKT ne saurait être tenu responsable de la conduite, en ligne ou hors ligne, de tout utilisateur de notre site Web ou de nos services.