Paxos $300 Trillion Oopsie

Someone at Paxos just speedran the entire history of monetary collapse in 22 minutes flat.

On Wednesday afternoon, October 15th, at 3:12 PM EST: a routine internal transfer became the most expensive typo since humans invented money.

Three hundred trillion dollars materialized on Ethereum - not million, not billion, but trillion with a T that nobody ordered.

For context, $300 trillion is more than 2.5 times larger than the entire world’s GDP, yet it took just $2.66 in gas fees to conjure from the void.

PayPal's "regulated" stablecoin PYUSD briefly became the richest entity in the observable universe, holding more value than every asset, commodity, and dream combined.

Then, faster than you could screenshot the Etherscan page, it all vanished into a burn address - the digital equivalent of ctrl+z with sweaty palms and a racing heart.

The smart contract worked flawlessly. The decimal places were catastrophically wrong. The single private key with god-mode privileges did exactly what it was told.

When your monetary system can accidentally create more wealth than has ever existed, then immediately delete it like a bad tweet, are we still calling this "financial infrastructure" or just expensive performance art?

The transaction log reads like a fairy tale written in bytecode. At 3:12 PM ET, a spell was cast.

Not with a wand, but with a terminal command.

The intended incantation was a simple $300 million internal transfer - moving water between buckets.

But the decimal places slipped, the zeros multiplied like enchanted brooms, and the Ethereum blockchain, ever the obedient servant, did exactly as it was told.

It spawned $300,000,000,000,000.

For 22 minutes, PayPal's PYUSD became the single largest concentration of notional wealth in human history.

The smart contract, flawless in its execution and catastrophic in its design, dutifully credited the amount to Paxos's treasury.

The entire spectacle, from creation to eventual cremation, cost a mere $2.66 in gas fees - making it the most cost-effective destruction of monetary trust ever engineered.

This wasn't a hack. It was a perfect pantomime of The Sorcerer's Apprentice: power wielded without understanding, creating chaos through perfect obedience.

The apprentice panicked as the brooms kept coming, and the financial world watched, mesmerized, as the tower flooded with trillions of dollars that were never supposed to exist.

The immediate question was how such a spell was even possible. But the real horror show wasn't the typo - it was the pristine, unfettered power behind it.

The system worked exactly as designed. So who gave the apprentice a god-mode terminal and looked the other way?

The God-Mode Terminal

The "how" was embarrassingly simple. No vaults, no multi-sig, no council of approval.

The power to create and destroy PayPal's stablecoin lived in a single Externally Owned Account (EOA) – a private key with the authority to mint and burn without limits, caps, or questions.

The EOA causing all the noise:
0x2fb074FA59c9294c71246825C1c9A0c7782d41a4

This wasn't a sophisticated exploit. It was King Midas with admin privileges.

For centuries, alchemists searched for the philosopher's stone. Paxos built one into their smart contract and handed the trigger to whoever held that key.

The result was the same: the touch of infinite wealth, instantly revealing itself as a curse.

Midas couldn't eat his gold.

Paxos couldn't explain why their "regulated" stablecoin had a literal infinite money glitch built directly into its foundation.

The $300 trillion was just a symptom.

The disease was a system where one fat finger, one moment of fatigue, could execute the most expensive typo in history because the safeguards were pure theater.

They built a monetary system that trusted a single human not to make a mistake. What does that say about their definition of "trust"?

22 Minutes of Hyperinflation

Zimbabwe’s central bank took years to orchestrate its iconic collapse - a meticulous, tragic devaluation that turned its currency into a punchline and its hundred-trillion-dollar notes into collector’s items.

Paxos did it in less time than a lunch break.

The sequence began with legitimate housekeeping: a routine burn of 300 million PYUSD, followed by a transfer of another 300 million between internal wallets. Standard procedure.

$300 Million Burned:
0xe9faf15455483e9503df599140550f19f4fa7e9dd3fdaed6ccfd597c64e80db2

$300 Million Transferred:
0xd6343c3d44f53edc524a72d64c819854929703d35c72afb071afe4fae0b84db2

Then someone reached for the philosopher's stone.

The next command should have been another routine mint. Instead, it became the most expensive typo in financial history.

$300 Trillion Minted:
0xc45dd1a77c05d9ae5b2284eea5393ecce2ac8a7e88e973c6ba3fe7a18bf45634

After the initial mint came the panic-burn, vaporizing the $300 trillion into a digital void.

$300 Trillion Burned:
0xaa532ae7f06cccdbdc226f59b68733ae8594464a98e128365f8170e305c34f4b

Then, in a move that defies all parody, they immediately minted another $300 million - a mere “oops” after the main event.

$300 Million Minted:
0x5b40975ea1326d1b48cb974d0fe1b8529b09a907c0a25833529e06cc60151abd

The entire hyperinflation and deflation cycle played out in the time it takes to order and forget a delivery pizza.

At least Zimbabwe’s money lasted long enough to be held.

Paxos created a monetary event so brief it barely qualified as a hallucination - the fastest destruction and restoration of monetary faith in human history.

The difference? Zimbabwe meant to do it.

When a “regulated” issuer can accidentally create and destroy the entire global economy 2.5 times over in under half an hour, are we watching finance - or performance art for the digitally deranged?

The Regulatory Hangover

The digital confetti had barely settled when the real-world repercussions began.

DeFi protocols, spooked by the ghost of $300 trillion, scrambled.

Aave froze PYUSD markets - a temporary quarantine for an asset that had just demonstrated planetary-scale volatility.

The timing couldn't be worse for Paxos.

Deep in the process of applying for a national trust charter with the OCC, their "fat finger" incident became a live-fire demonstration for every skeptical regulator.

Amanda Fischer, ex-Chief of Staff to the SEC's Gary Gensler, framed it perfectly: "If someone with a fat finger error can increase the total supply of a stablecoin by a factor of 120,000, then perhaps regulators should proceed cautiously with granting that firm... the keys to the payment system."

The incident proved that the most critical failure point isn't in the code, but in the off-chain "trust us" model that the code was meant to replace.

They asked for the keys to the traditional banking system right after proving they can't be trusted with a god-mode terminal. So what happens when the wizard returns to find his tower flooded?

Three stories, one brutal truth.

The Sorcerer's Apprentice flooded the world with money he couldn't control - just like Paxos watching their terminal spawn $300 trillion.

King Midas proved that infinite wealth is a curse - mirrored in that single private key whose touch could spawn limitless tokens, immediately threatening to vaporize the very trust that gave them value.

And Zimbabwe's slow-motion collapse was speedrun in a coffee break - Paxos achieving in 22 minutes what took a nation years.

Paxos didn't just fail at decimals - they failed at the fundamental premise of finance: trust.

They built a system where a single point of human failure could trigger a monetary supernova, all while their banking charter application sat on regulators' desks.

The smart contract executed perfectly - which was the entire problem.

The entire concept of "regulated" stablecoin was exposed as a carefully managed illusion, propped up by promises and prayers.

We spent a decade arguing about immutable code and trustless systems, only to discover the most dangerous central point of failure remains the same as always: the human with the keyboard and the power to use it without limits.

So when the next oopsie inevitably happens, will anyone still be surprised - or are we just watching the slow, expensive death of a promise?

REKT sirve como plataforma pública para autores anónimos, nos deslindamos de la responsabilidad por las opiniones y contenidos alojados en REKT.

dona (ETH / ERC20): 0x3C5c2F4bCeC51a36494682f91Dbc6cA7c63B514C

aviso legal:

REKT no es responsable ni culpable de ninguna manera por cualquier Contenido publicado en nuestro Sitio Web o en conexión con nuestros Servicios, sin importar si fueron publicados o causados por Autores ANÓN de nuestro Sitio Web, o por REKT. Aunque determinamos reglas para la conducta y publicaciones de los Autores ANÓN, no controlamos y no somos responsables por cualquier contenido ofensivo, inapropiado, obsceno, ilegal o de cualquier forma objetable, que se pudiera encontrar en nuestro Sitio Web o Servicios. REKT no es responsable por la conducta, en línea o fuera de línea, de cualquier usuario de nuestro Sitio Web o Servicios.