Two CEX rekt in one week.
Why do we see more “compromised keys” in uncertain markets?
Are late profit takers grabbing what they can?
AscendEX described themselves as a “group of Wall Street quantitative trading veterans”, so it’s little surprise that they were playing fast and loose with other people’s money.
Claims of “compromised keys” leave us with little to say, and even AscendEX themselves have yet to explain how they let this happen.
One thing’s for certain - the AscendEX Twitter intern has been busy with the delete button.
Too late though - we saw it all.
This one was posted yesterday.
Isn’t it annoying when your private keys fall out of your ears.
Funds were drained from the hot wallet across three chains, beginning at just before 8PM +UTC on December 11th.
AscendEX is still investigating what led to the wallet being compromised.
Peckshield puts the losses at $60M on Ethereum, $9.2M on BSC and $8.5M on Polygon.
The stolen funds are currently located in the hacker’s address on:
One of the assets stolen on BSC, Bemil Coin, has dumped over 98% in price since the incident, leading to the value of the loot on BSC to drop by some $6.5M.
In the team’s initial announcement, a full reimbursement was promised to any affected users.
Withdrawals, however, have been suspended.
In a later update, AscendEX detailed their next steps; the first being the refund.
Let’s see if they prioritise their users or wait until more of the stolen coins fall in value...
This has been a brutal loss for Ascendex - as one anon pointed out; “they lost more than their entire series b raise”.
Let’s end with a few more choice tweets from this rekt CEX.
And what about this one, posted just hours after they lost $77M.
Not if you keep it with Ascendex.
However, our favourite tweet of theirs was the quote from Zack Voell;
“People are losing airpods, and we think the mainstream is ready for private keys?”
REKT serves as a public platform for anonymous authors, we take no responsibility for the views or content hosted on REKT.
donate (ETH / ERC20): 0x3C5c2F4bCeC51a36494682f91Dbc6cA7c63B514C
REKT is not responsible or liable in any manner for any Content posted on our Website or in connection with our Services, whether posted or caused by ANON Author of our Website, or by REKT. Although we provide rules for Anon Author conduct and postings, we do not control and are not responsible for what Anon Author post, transmit or share on our Website or Services, and are not responsible for any offensive, inappropriate, obscene, unlawful or otherwise objectionable content you may encounter on our Website or Services. REKT is not responsible for the conduct, whether online or offline, of any user of our Website or Services.
you might also like...
Wintermute have lost over $160M to their second incident this summer. Using a vanity address for "gas savings" has cost them dearly. Last time, funds were returned, will Wintermute get lucky again?
The billion that wasn't. Tornado sanctions didn’t deter these Polkadot thieves, who tried to steal ~$1.3B in aUSD from Acala Network.
Curve fell victim to a DNS hijacking yesterday, with approximately $575k lost to malicious contract approvals. For users, DeFi protocols are only as secure as their centrally-hosted front end. How much longer will web3 rely on web2?